EPR before EPR: a 1930 Einstein–Bohr thought experiment revisited

The Epr Thought - Experiment and the Epr

Einstein, Podolsky and Rosen (EPR) argued that the quantum-mechanical probabilistic description of physical reality had to be incomplete, in order to avoid an instantaneous action between distant measurements. This suggested the need for additional “hidden variables”, allowing for the recovery of determinism and locality, but such a solution has been disproved experimentally. Here, I present an...

The EPR Experiment: A Prelude to Bohr’s Reply to EPR

New Slant on the EPR-Bell Experiment

The best case for thinking that quantum mechanics is nonlocal rests on Bell’s Theorem, and later results of the same kind. However, the correlations characteristic of EPR-Bell (EPRB) experiments also arise in familiar cases elsewhere in QM, where the two measurements involved are timelike rather than spacelike separated; and in which the correlations are usually assumed to have a local causal e...

EPR correlations and EPW distributions revisited

It is shown that Bell’s proof of violation of local realism in phase space is incorrect. Using Bell’s approach, a violation can be derived also for nonnegative Wigner distributions. The error is found to lie in the use of an unnormalizable Wigner function.

A Finite, Rational Model for the Epr-bohm Experiment*

-. We construct 3+1 space-time and particles from bit-strings of finite length. At an early stage in the construction, we find that we can identify single particle Dirac wave functions. Considering a space-like trajectory for a single particle we find the usual spin correlations which violate Bell’s inequalities. The only “non-local” parameter is our discrete version of the global time ordering...